Legal Opinion

Appeal From Ordinance No. 384

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1978No. Appeals, 398 and 397 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Bowman,

Appellee, Borough of Dale (Borough), employed a police department consisting of two full-time officers. On September 14, 1976, the Borough Council (Council) passed Ordinance No. 384 (Ordinance), Section I of which abolished the police department and Section III of which authorized the Council to contract for police protection with the City of Johnstown pursuant to Section 1202(35) of The Borough Code (Code), Act of February 1, 1966, P.L. (1965) 1656, as amended, 53 P.S. §46202(35). On October 12, 1976, appellant at No. 397 C.D. 1977, the Mayor of the Borough…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clearview Bowling Center, Inc. v. Hanover BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. George v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Knauer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. SterlaceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Angelotti v. Rankin BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Donivan v. Dallastown BoroughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. ALMY v. Borough of WilkinsburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Township of Perkiomen v. MestCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. McFarland v. ParkhouseCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Donivan v. Dallastown BoroughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API