Legal Opinion

Doremus v. Doremus

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 9, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On petition for divorce.

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, V. C.

This case was fully tried before me on October 18th, 1917. The suit is brought for divorce by a husband against a wife. The charge was that on a certain date she committed adultery with a certain man. The petitioner has now applied for leave to dismiss his petition and has consented tó a decree dismissing it. I had already reached the conclusion that the petition should be dismissed. Notwithstanding the fact that the case seems to be disposed of, it would seem that there are certain features that attention should be called to. The principal witness produced by the petitioner is a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marsh v. MarshNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1862
  2. McVickar v. McVickarNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
  3. Westerfield v. WesterfieldNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API