Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dunn

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1914No. Appeal, No. 9PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 9, March T., 1914, by William Daley, from judgment of Q. S. Mifflin Co., Jan. Sessions, 1914, No. 1, imposing a fine on appellant in case of Commonwealth v. Clint. Dunn. Indictment for selling liquor without a license. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was in imposing the fine referred to in the opinion of the Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

It appears by the record that the defendant was charged, upon the information of the appellant, with selling liquor without license; that after hearing the defendant was held to bail for his appearance at court and in default was committed to jail; that after the proceedings were returned to court three successive subpoenas were issued directing the appellant to appear on certain dates to testify on behalf of the commonwealth in the case; and that on May 6, 1914, the prosecutor not appearing, the defendant was discharged. The prosecutor was not under recognizance to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NewtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  2. Case of HummelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Luks v. BlattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API