Legal Opinion
McKeown v. Bank for Savings
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided December 15, 1898Published
Appeal from order making one Alexander McKeown party defendant herein in place of the defendant “ The Bank for Savings.”
1Opinion of the CourtScotchman, J.
Under the authority of Mahro v. Greenwich Savings Bank, 16 Misc. Rep. 537, the order appealed from is right and is affirmed, with costs.
2ConcurrenceOlcott, J.
Order affirmed, with costs.
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Mahro v. Greenwich Savings BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896