Legal Opinion
City of Huntsville v. Rowe
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 26, 2004No. 1020868PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Application for Rehearing
2Per curiam
The opinion of October 31, 2003, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor.
The City of Huntsville (“the City”) appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding compensation in a condemnation proceeding to Roland H. Rowe, as trustee of the Dimitriu Family Trust, and Elvina Geauque, the owners of the condemned property (“the owners”), and from the trial court’s order denying the City’s postjudgment motion for a new trial. We affirm.
The City condemned a portion of the owners’ property to secure an easement described as follows in the order of…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Alabama Power Co. v. Keystone Lime Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Long Distance Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Ensign Yellow Pine Co. v. HohenbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Cousins v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Alabama Power Co. v. CardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2008
- Farrell v. Vermont Electric Power Co., and Vermont Transco, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Farrell v. Vermont Electric Power Co., and Vermont Transco, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012