Peninsular Land Company v. Howard

CHAPMAN, J.:

The case at bar comes on for a review by this Court for the second time. The former opinion is reported in 149 Fla. 772, 6 So. (2nd) 384. The challenged decree presents three questions for a decision by this Court: (a) the portion of the decree dismissing the suit; (b) the portion of the decree vacating and setting aside the final decree of .the lower court dated April 7, 1940; (c) the portion of the order allowing and disallowing designated items of cost. Appellee by cross assignments of error raises the legal sufficiency of enumerated cost items disallowed.

Counsel for appellant…