Legal Opinion

Baker v. Hayden

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 6, 2018No. 117989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Standridge, J.:

*34 *474 Attorney Linus Baker filed a request under the Kansas Open Records Act (KORA), K.S.A. 45-215 et seq., with Katherine Stocks, the Court Administrator for the Tenth Judicial District, asking to inspect and copy digital audio recordings from court proceedings in a case in which he was neither a party nor counsel for a party. After the request was denied, Baker brought an action against Stocks, alleging that she had violated the KORA as well as his common-law and constitutional rights to access the audio recordings. The district court granted Stocks' motion to dismiss, holding…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Schmidt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  3. Cypress Media, Inc. v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. Ullery v. OthickSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  5. Stephens v. Van ArsdaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker v. HaydenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  2. Baker v. HaydenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. Idstrom v. German May, PCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API