Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 20, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Settle

Affirming as to Brooks and reversing as to Minton.

The appellants, Asa Brooks and Claude Minton, were jointly indicted, tried and convicted in the Edmonson circuit court of the offense of unlawfully having in their possession intoxicating liquors, not for medicinal, mechanical, scientific or sacramental purposes, and the punishment of each fixed by verdict of a jury and judgment of the court at a fine of $100.00 and thirty days in jail. Both have appealed.

It is urged that the judgment should be reversed as to -each of them because of error alleged to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sizemore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Skidmore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Nethercutt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. State v. LaneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Eckroth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  5. State v. HornadayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API