Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bain v. Colbert County Northwest Alabama Health Care Authority

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 10, 2017No. 1150764Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partParker, Justice

I concur as to the affirmance of the summary judgment in favor of the emergency-room nurses. I respectfully dissent as to the affirmance of the summary judgment in favor of Colbert County Northwest Alabama Health Care Authority d/b/a Helen Keller Hospital (“HKH”) on Melissa Bain’s claim that HKH was vicariously liable for Dr. Preston Wigfall’s alleged negligence. Specifically, I find that Bain presented substantial evidence from which the jury could conclude that HKH is vicariously liable for the acts of Dr. Wigfall, its emergency-room physician.

I agree with the recitation of the law in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Sycamore Municipal HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Baptist Memorial Hospital System v. SampsonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Sanchez v. Medicorp Health SystemSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  4. Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. St. Vincent's Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Mejia v. Community Hospital of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API