Legal Opinion
Harmatz v. Zenith Radio Corporation
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 1970No. 5093PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant filed a complaint in the Court of General Sessions for an “action for breach of warranty of merchantability” and joined as defendants, the Joseph M. Zamoiski Company, and the Zenith Radio Corporation, “c/o the Joseph M. Zamoiski Company.” Zamoiski is apparently not a District of Columbia corporation, because the complaint reflects that service was made on its registered agent in the District of Columbia. See D.C. Code 1967, § 13-334(a). The record does not disclose how service was ever made on Zenith, except to suggest that it was simply made by serving the complaint on Zamoiski’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sardo v. McGrath Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Kron v. Young & Simon, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Key v. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re A.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Spoljaric v. PanganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hawkins v. HallDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Everett v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Kron v. Young & Simon, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.