Dervisevic v. Dervisevic
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*786The appeal from the order entered June 4, 2010, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from that order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
Although this Court has adopted a liberal policy with respect to vacating defaults in matrimonial actions, it is still incumbent upon a defendant to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his or her default and the existence of a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Elder v. ElderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Atwater v. MaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Cole-Hatchard v. Grand UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Heaven v. McGowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Deutsche Bank Trust Co. v. GhanessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Jovanovic v. JovanovicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- DeMarquez v. GalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Castor v. CuevasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Gordon v. BoydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.