Davies v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
This expedited petition for review brings before us a challenge to signatures supporting a public initiative and an informal rule employed by the District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics (the Board) in counting those signatures. The initiative in question, entitled “The Prohibition of Horse-Drawn Carriages Act of 1990,” 1 would be placed on the ballot in a special election to be held on November 5, 1991. Petitioner is the owner and operator of a horse-drawn carriage business, apparently the only one of its kind still operating in the District. She contends…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barnett v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Jones & Artis Construction Co. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hawkins v. HallDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Malcolm Price, Inc. v. District Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Citizens Against Legalized Gambling v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hessey v. BurdenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Wilson v. BowserDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025