Hill v. Cockrell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Webb, Judge.
"[W]here the trial judge, sitting as the trior of the facts, hears the evidence, his findings based upon conflicting evidence is analogous to the verdict of a jury and should not be disturbed by a reviewing court if there is any evidence to support it.” West v. West, 228 Ga. 397, 398 (185 SE2d 763) (1971);Lester Colodny Const. Co. v. Allen, 129 Ga. App. 545 (199 SE2d 917) (1973). Here there was ample legal evidence to support the findings of fact, and there is no error in the trial judge’s conclusions of law.
Judgment affirmed.
Deen, P. J., and Marshall, J., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- West v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- LESTER COLODNY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Hill v. CockrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dyna-Comp Corp. v. Selig Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Blue Cross of Georgia/Atlanta, Inc. v. GrenwaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Kelly v. CubbedgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Levy v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Blue Cross of Georgia/Atlanta, Inc. v. GrenwaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.