Legal Opinion

Rautine v. Preston

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFrederick B. Bryant, J.

The plaintiffs move for an order directing the defendants to divulge the liability insurance coverage which is available to satisfy part or all of any judgment which may be entered in this action. Such motion is made pursuant to CPLR 3101 (subd [f]) recently enacted by the New York State Legislature and effective on and after August 6, 1975. (L 1975, ch 668, § 1.)

The above section is a part of the general provisions of the CPLR pertaining to the scope of pretrial discovery. Its purpose was to permit discovery of the existence and contents of a liability insurance agreement.

The defendants have…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mosca v. PenskyNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Mosca v. PenskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peterson v. LongNew York Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API