Legal Opinion · Dissent

Coloma Oil & Gas Corporation v. Railroad Commission

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1962No. A-8625Published

1DissentChief Justice Calvert

I dissent.

I agree that the validity of the Commission’s order granting the Appell permit may not be upheld on the ground that the tract on which it was granted is entitled to separate development as a matter of law. Our decision in Railroad Commission v. C. Murel Williams, 163 Texas 370, 356 S.W. 2d 131, destroys that theory for the granting of drilling permits as exceptions to Rule 37.

The real issue remaining in the case is this: Does the evidence introduced in the trial court discharge Coloma’s burden of proving that the order of the Railroad Commission granting the permit is not supported…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Trapp v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Board of Firemen's Relief & Retirement Fund Trustees v. MarksTexas Supreme Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API