Legal Opinion

Harnage v. Dzurenda

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 28, 2016No. 3:14-cv-885 (SRU)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Stefan R. Underhill, United States District Judge

James A. Harnage commenced this civil rights action while incarcerated in the custody of the .Connecticut Department of Correction. In the only remaining claim in his amended complaint, Harnage contends that the defendants — Commissioners James Dzurenda, Theresa Lantz, and Brian Murphy; and Deputy Commissioners Carol Salisbury, Robert Foltz, and Cheryl Cepelak — have violated his right to equal protection of the laws by failing to provide to male inmates the legal assistance in civil family matters that…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arthur Piccolo v. New York City Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
  2. Son v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API