Legal Opinion · Dissent

Federated Milk Producer's Ass'n v. Statewide Plumbing & Heating Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1961No. 9214Published

1DissentCallister, Justice

I dissent. The evidence is uncontradicted that the warning signs were posted and visible. The investigating officer, who approached the scene of the accident from the *301south shortly after its occurrence, testified that he saw the two signs reading “Construction Slow” and “One Way Traffic.” He stated that he was able to readily read these signs and had to drive around them.

The driver of plaintiff’s tank truck did not testify that the signs were not visible, but only that he did not remember having seen them.

It would seem that this failure to see that which was plainly there for any driver using…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mingus v. OlssonUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Andersen v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  3. Stalker v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API