Legal Opinion
Hammond v. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 31, 1895No. 231PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
This is an action at law, brought by the plaintiff in error to recover damages for the infringement of a patent for a design for a railway car-body. The case was tried without a jury, by the consent of the respective parties, and the court found all *717of the issues of fact in favor of the plaintiff in error, except the issue of patentable invention. In respect lo that issue, the court found:
‘■That, prior to tlio date oí plaintiff's alleged Invention, there was taown and in use on the Market Street Cable Road, In Che city and county of San Francisco, and state of California,,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- Myers v. SternheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Majestic Electric Development Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
- Gaskill v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
- Charles Boldt Co. v. Turner Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- Phœnix Knitting Works v. Hygienic Fleeced Underwear Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1911