Stahl v. Kincade
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtPfaff, J.
— This appeal is from a judgment entered in an action for libel brought by appellant when appellant refused to plead over following the sustaining of de murrers to her amended complaint. The alleged libelous language complained of was set forth in what are denominated as counter-claims in a former action between appellant, as plaintiff, and the appellees, Paul L. Petty and Mary Petty, as defendants, in which action the other three appellees were attorneys for defendants.
Appellees contend that the alleged libelous matter was an absolutely privileged communication because it was set forth and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Myers v. HodgesSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Hastings v. LuskCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Bruns v. CopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Strauss v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Millspaugh v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Briggs v. Clinton County Bank & Trust Co. of FrankfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Sidney Brown v. Dennis Collins, Dennis Collins v. First National Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
- The Estate of Richard A. Mayer, and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty v. Lax, Inc., and David LascoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Curry v. OrwigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Smith v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.