Legal Opinion
In Re Parmalat Securitìes Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 5, 2007No. 04 MD 1653(LAK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
Grant Thornton International (“GTI”) and Grant Thornton LLP (“GT LLP”) (collectively, “GT”) move for an order modifying the preliminary injunction previously entered under Section 304 of the Bankruptcy Code 1 (the “304 Order”) to permit them to assert certain claims in the Securities Fraud Action and one of the Recovery Actions, as those terms were defined in In re Parmalat Finanziaria S.p.A 2 This order assumes familiarity with that opinion and with my unreported bench opinion of March 29, 2006, in which I granted a motion by Bank of America (“BoA”)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Laszlo Adam, Dennis W. Brush, Michael J. Connelly, Jack Weinstein, Marcel Fournier, William S. Kingson v. Eli S. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Cunard Steamship Company Limited v. Salen Reefer Services Ab, United Brands Company, GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Bay Ridge Air Rights, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Andrulonis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Critical-Vac Filtration Corporation v. Minuteman International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Parmalat Capital Finance Ltd. v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- In Re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Route 21 Associates of Belleville, Inc. v. MHC, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Bondi v. Grant Thornton InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007