Legal Opinion

Barkenthien v. . People

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion for re-argument. (See 212 N. Y. 36.)

1Per curiam

The grounds of the motion indicate a misunderstanding of the force and effect of our decision. We held: 1. That in an action to register a title under article 12 of the Beal Property Law (Chapter 52 of the Laws of 1909, as amended by chapter 627 of the Laws of 1910) the issues were created by the complaint and the answer precisely as in an ordinary action under the Code and were triable in like manner except as otherwise expressly provided in said statute. 2. That pursuant to section 385 of the statute the examiner’s certificate of title, the abstract, searches and survey were presumptive…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Partenfelder v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bruce v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. City of New York v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Sherman v. CarmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. In re the Estate of VioliNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API