Legal Opinion

Anskis v. Fischer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 1984No. 1256PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

The sole issue presented to us in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in molding the verdict returned by the jury in this case and marking the judgment satisfied. We affirm.

This action was commenced by appellant who was injured when the automobile in which he was travelling was struck by a vehicle driven by Selma Fischer. At the time of the accident Mr. Anskis was an employee of Sears, Roebuck & Company and was riding in a Sears vehicle which was driven by another Sears employee in the scope of his employment.

Mr. Anskis filed a complaint against Selma Fischer and her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Socha v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Heckendorn v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Brogley v. Chambersburg Engineering Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. MacKey v. AdamskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Turner Construction Co v. HebnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. LeFlar v. Gulf Creek Indus. Park No. 2Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Boris v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Boris v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Fye v. Woodland Forrest Products Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API