Legal Opinion

Miller v. Rigney

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Orange Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

Suit by Rigney to foreclose a mortgage. Answer : First. That defendants had purchased the land mortgaged of plaintiff, who covenanted to save the defendants harmless from judgments, and costs that might be assessed against them, for flowing water on the lands of third persons, by the dam on the land so purchased; breach, that there was a suit then pending, &c., in the Supreme Court for, &c., the costs of which were $500; and that there was a large amount of costs in other suits for, &c., which had been pending in the Orange Circuit Court, which defendants were compelled to pay, with…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Throp v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. MilbraSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Free v. HaworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API