Legal Opinion

Pharmanex v. Shalala

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 21, 2000No. 99-4087PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.

This case requires that we address the scope of 21 U.S.C. § 321(ff)(3)(B) as it relates to the FDA’s power to regulate dietary supplements. Appellants (hereinafter, “FDA”) appeal from the federal district court’s order setting aside the FDA’s Administrative Decision of May 20, 1998. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand for resolution of record based arguments not reached below.

Background,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Pharmanex, markets a product, Cholestin, that is intended to promote healthy cholesterol levels. Cho-lestin is made from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Molzof v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. Generix Drug Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rosenfield v. HSBC Bank, USACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. LamirandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. BaderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. Center for Legal Advocacy v. HammonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API