Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Willis

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 26, 1973No. 25,766Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDuncan, Judge

In this case we are called upon to decide whether the defense counsel was statutorily disqualified from rep*115resenting the appellant at trial. Article 27, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 827, in pertinent part, mandates that “[n]o person who has acted for the prosecution may act later in the same case for the defense.” A problem is raised here because even though the defense counsel at trial stated, “I have acted only in the defense capacity in this case,” his name appears in the allied papers as the “judge advocate” with whom the case was “discussed” by the Army criminal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API