Legal Opinion

Stuessy v. Byrd, Davis and Eisenberg

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1964No. 11244PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHER, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the grant of a temporary injunction. It embraces the law of interference. Appellees, plaintiffs in the Trial Court, are practicing attorneys. Appellants, defendants in the Trial Court, are businessmen. E. E. Stuessy is the owner of the contracting business and Fred Crooks is his office manager.

Michael DeLeuil was injured in the course of his employment on January 10, 1964. He employed plaintiffs on January 11, 1964, to represent him in a possible workman’s compensation suit. He started back to work, but without Stuessy’s personal knowledge, during…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Texas Foundaries, Inc. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers UnionTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  3. Goss v. Star Engraving Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Thrift Finance Company v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. TraverTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Dreyer v. JaletDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1972
  3. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. American National Petroleum Co. Ex Rel. Oil Investments, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API