Rosen v. Rosen

Francine Rosen raises fourteen points in her appeal from the final judgment of dissolution of her marriage; Louis Rosen cross-appeals. We reverse as to two points, affirm as to all others with the exception of the attorney’s fee issue which *475is not ripe for appeal, see Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So.2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), and write to address one issue we believe merits discussion.

The trial court did not err in failing to include written justification for its determination that one-half of the assets originally held in the Charles Schwab account were marital property. Section 61.075(3),…