Legal Opinion

Rick Bertrand v. Rick Mullin and the Iowa Democratic Party

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 16, 2014No. 12–0649PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Chief Justice.

In this appeal and cross-appeal, we must decide whether a political campaign advertisement aired on television constituted actionable defamation. The district court overruled a motion for directed verdict at trial, and a jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. Both parties appealed and raised a variety of claims of error. On our review, we conclude the verdict cannot stand because the action was not supported by sufficient evidence of actual malice. We reverse the judgment of the district court and dismiss the case.

I. Background Facts and Prior Proceedings.

Rick Bertrand…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Devin Nunes v. Ryan LizzaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. Goodman v. Performance Contractors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2019
  3. Chandler v. Advance N.M. Now PACNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Craig Malin v. Sarah Watson, Deb Anselm, Astrid Garcia and Lee Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2026
  5. Daniel B. Eisenstein v. WTVF-TVCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API