Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Lumsden (In re Geothermal Resources International, Inc.)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 21, 1996No. Nos. 94-16219, 94-16220PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Hamilton and Baldwin appeal the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) partial grant of summary judgment in favor of the trustee. Because the BAP’s decision disposed of all claims in the suit, we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
Geothermal Resources International, Inc. (“GEO”) produces and sells geothermal energy. In 1988 and 1989, the company experienced severe financial difficulties; by the end of 1990, one of GEO’s few significant assets was a 50% equity interest in the East Mesa Project, held by its subsidiary New East Mesa, Ltd.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re Dant & Russell, Inc., Debtors. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Creditor-Appellant v. Dant & Russell, Inc., Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Fred Lowenschuss, Debtor. Resorts International, Inc. v. Fred LowenschussCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In Re Khalil and Shahin Chinichian, Debtors. Khalil and Shahin Chinichian v. Attilio CampolongoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.