Legal Opinion

Plant v. Plant

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 17, 1987No. 86-1101PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Finding no merit in any of the points raised by appellant, we affirm the trial court’s Order on Pending Motions.1 Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985); Brown v. Brown, 484 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 4th *45DCA 1986); Massey v. Massey, 443 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Holmes v. Holmes, 384 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Albert v. Albert, 186 So.2d 809 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); see Martinez v. Martinez, 383 So.2d 1153, 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (ambiguities in support provisions of settlement agreement are interpreted according to the best interests of the children involved).

We reverse, however, that portion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bowen v. BowenSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Martinez v. MartinezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Massey v. MasseyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Keenan v. KeenanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Holmes v. HolmesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marriage of Earnhardt v. EarnhardtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API