Legal Opinion

Perry v. Markle

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1934No. 28965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action for the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage. Defendants had decree, and plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff’s petition is in the usual form for the foreclosure of a mortgage. The mortgagor is deceased, and defendants are his children, their spouses and the administrator of his estate. For defenses they allege laches, statute of limitations and satisfaction of the mortgage.

The record discloses . that the mortgagor, Samuel H. Perry, acquired title to the mortgaged premises in 1914. He was then a widower with five children. He told his children that he was buying this land for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ballou v. SherwoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hawley v. Von LankenNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Gatling v. LaneNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  4. D' Gette v. SheldonNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Severson v. McKenzieNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brtek v. CihalNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Stryker v. RaschWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Cook v. HallNebraska Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API