Legal Opinion
Third National Bank v. Reilly
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Mandamus. Relator applied for mandamus to strike from the files an amendment to a chancery bill allowed by respondent. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This is an application for mandamus growing out of the case of Haug v. Third Nat’l Bank, which is reported in 77 Mich. 474.
After the filing of the opinion in this Court, and on January 31, 1890, Hon. C. J. Reilly, one of the circuit judges of Wayne county, made an order permitting the complainant, Edmund Haug, assignee of George Morley, to amend his bill of complaint by making the said George Morley a party defendant, and by adding the following to the prayer of the bill:
“And that the said George Morley be required to perfect by appropriate conveyance the title of the complainant, as his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Haug v. Third National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by2 opinions
- Third National Bank v. HaugMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Kellogg v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1911