Legal Opinion

Maya Realty Associates v. Holland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Joseph Holland, as Commissioner of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, dated June 25, 1997, which found that the petitioner had overcharged for rent and awarded treble damages, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated January 26, 1998, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Administrative Code of City of New York § 26-516 (a) provides that in the case of a rent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Century Tower Associates v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Charles Birdoff & Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. 455 Ocean Associates v. New York State Division of Housing& Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ador Realty, LLC v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Acevedo v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API