Legal Opinion
Chicago Metallic Mfg. Co. v. Edward Katzinger Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 12, 1941No. 7716PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
By this appeal plaintiff seeks reversal of a judgment dismissing its complaint for a declaratory judgment.
Plaintiff set out in its complaint that it and the defendant were Illinois corporations having their principal offices and places of business in Chicago, Illinois;that plaintiff was engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling tinware made up into various appliances, all free and clear of patent rights belonging to others; that it had operated under a certain license agreement with defendant and had complied with all its terms including the payment of all…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- E. Edelmann & Co. v. Triple-A Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Consumers Finance Service, Inc. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- American Automobile Ins. Co. v. FreundtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Cunningham Brothers, Inc. v. Harry BailCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Zurich Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
- Yellow Cab Co. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.