Legal Opinion

Bliss v. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 13, 1981No. 51351PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Judge.

Employee seeks review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals denying his petition for temporary partial disability benefits during a 52-week *461retraining course based on a finding that he was not entitled to such benefits during his period of retraining. Having concluded that this finding is without evidentiary support and is in fact contrary to the evidence, we reverse.

It is well settled that temporary partial disability is present when (1) an employee has sustained a physical disability, (2) it is temporary rather than permanent in nature, (3) it is partial,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Merrick's Super Market, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Dorn v. A. J. Chromy Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Kuehn v. State, Department of Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Minnick v. South Metro Fire Protection DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Le v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Bliss v. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API