Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Ausdal Financial Partners, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 9, 2016No. Civil Action No. 15-12899-FDSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PETITIONER’S MOTION TO CONFIRM THE ARBITRATION AWARD AND RESPONDENTS’ MOTION TO VACATE THE ARBITRATION AWARD
SAYLOR, United States District Judge
This is an action to confirm an arbitration award entered by a panel of three arbitrators in resolution of a dispute between petitioner Cindy-Marie Rogers and respondents Joan Norton and Ausdal Financial Partners, Inc. Ausdal and Norton contend that the award must be vacated pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)(2)-(4) because the arbitration panel acted improperly. Specifically, they contend that the panel (1) awarded damages that were…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lanza v. Fin. Indus. Regulatory Auth.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Sanwan Trust v. Lindsay, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- System4, LLC v. RibeiroDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Lanza v. Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- William Marks v. Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC, et al.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2026