Legal Opinion

Mzimaz v. Barik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 76-f, a court with jurisdiction to make a child custody determination under Domestic Relations Law article 5-A may decline to exercise such jurisdiction if it determines that New York is an inconvenient forum and that another state or country is a more appropriate forum (see Domestic Relations Law § 75-d [1]; § 76-f [1]; Matter of Swain v Vogt, 206 AD2d 703 [1994]). The factors to be considered in making this determination include the length of time the child has resided outside the state, the distance between the court in this state and the court in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Swain v. VogtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hassan v. SilvaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Paderno v. ShvetsovaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Hassan v. SilvaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Matter of Peiyi Wang v. ChristensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  5. Paderno v. ShvetsovaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API