Legal Opinion
United States v. J. Michael Kirtley
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 8, 1993No. 93-1374PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.
When J. Michael Kirtley (“Kirtley”) violated a condition of his probation, his probation officer and the United States Attorneys’ Office filed separate motions to notify the district court of the violations. After a hearing, the district court revoked Kirtley’s probation. Kirtley appeals the revocation of his probation, arguing that the written notice supplied to him was insufficient to meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(2)(A) and the due process clause of the United States Constitution. We have jurisdiction to hear this appeal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lloyd E. Williams, Jr. And Mildred A. Williams v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Charles J. Spears, Also Known as "Blackie," and Donald Meeks, United States of America v. Kim CurranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Gilbert BiermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Lorenzo J. CotroneoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Christopher BoultinghouseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Tidwell v. Smith (In Re Smith)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dale Eric HAVIER, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. David FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.