Legal Opinion

Williams v. Bell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1915No. 22,789PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From Grant 'Circuit Court; Joseph M. Rabb, Special Judge. Proceeding by David M. Bell against Wilber E. Williams to contest an election for the office of prosecuting attorney. From a judgment for eontestor, the eontestee appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

At the general election in 1914, appellant and appellee were rival candidates for the office of prosecuting attorney for the 48th judicial circuit which Grant County constituted. Such election in Grant County was by paper ballots and not by voting machines.' On the face of the returns certified to and canvassed by the county board of election commissioners, which constituted the county board of canvassers, appellant received a plurality over appellee of nine votes and he was by the board declared duly elected to the office which also issued to him the certificate to that effect contemplated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. State, ex rel. TitusIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Hoy v. State, ex rel. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Indianapolis, Decatur & Western Railway Co. v. SandsIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State ex rel. Waymire v. ShayIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Rosenmeier v. MahrenholzIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Robertson v. Circuit Court of Lake Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Conley v. HileIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State Ex Rel. McCormick v. Sup. Ct. of Knox Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Martin v. YoungbloodIndiana Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API