Legal Opinion

Bell & Hudson, PC v. Buhl Realty Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1990No. Docket 109190, 109191, 109192PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGribbs, J.

This consolidated appeal arises out of the June 11, 1982, arson and shooting at the Detroit Buhl Building in which one person was killed and several others were seriously injured. Defendant Gerald Harrington (Gerald) appeals by leave granted from the denial of defendants’ motions for partial summary disposition. We reverse.

At approximately 11:00 A.M., on June 11, 1982, Gerald received a telephone call at work from his sister-in-law, Katherine Harrington. Katherine told Gerald that Gerald’s brother, Robert Harrington, was going to the law firm of Bell & Hudson, P.C., to demand the return of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Samson v. Saginaw Professional Building, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Kroll v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Duvall v. GoldinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Cook v. BennettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Marcelletti v. BathaniMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Ross v. GlaserMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Graves v. Warner Bros.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Noel v. Fleet Finance, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. Stiver v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API