Legal Opinion

Brinsfield v. Robbins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 17, 1936No. 11315PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the petition. Regardless of other questions, the plaintiff can not recover unless she can obtain a cancellation of the decree of retraxit as entered in the superior court on July 28, 1930. Code, §§ 3-507, 3-508. If the allegations do not show that she is entitled to this relief, it is quite unnecessary to inquire whether in the absence of such decree the petition states a sufficient cause for cancellation of the settlement receipt and the alleged retraxit as signed by the plaintiff, or of the judgment of the court…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Crawford v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Morris v. JohnstoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Poullain v. PoullainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  5. Kirkley v. SharpSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Stephens v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Middleton v. PrudenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Pinkerton and Laws Co., Inc. v. Roadway Exp., Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1986
  4. Nelson v. EstillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Quinn v. ForsythCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API