State v. Kintli

¶1 Kintli was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol (“DUI”) per se in city court and appealed to the District Court. Kintli moved the District Court to suppress results of an Intoxilyzer 5000 test. The District Court denied her motion and Kintli, reserving her right to appeal, pled guilty to DUI per se. The District Court subsequently entered judgment sentencing Kintli. We affirm.

¶2 Kintli raises the following issue on appeal which we restate as follows:

¶3 Did the District Court err by denying defendant’s motion to suppress the results of a detention center breath test…