Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 15, 1953No. [No. 138, October Term, 1952.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The appeal is from a judgment following a directed verdict for the appellees. The question to be decided is whether the appellant was engaged in extra-hazardous, and thus compensable, employment at the time of the injury suffered by her in 1949. The State Industrial Accident Commission decided that the appellees were not employers, and the appellant was not an employee, within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Cornelia Simmons, the appellant, appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City and the case went to trial before a jury. At the conclusion of the whole cas"e, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Congressional Country Club, Inc. v. Baltimore & RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Levin v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. SchwindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  4. Mayor of Baltimore v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  5. Union Mining Co. v. BlankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunnill v. BloombergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  2. Marsolek v. Miller Waste MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API