Legal Opinion
Rio Tinto PLC v. Vale S.A.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 2, 2015No. 14 Civ. 3042(RMB)(AJP)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
Predictive Coding a.k.a. Computer Assisted Review a.k.a. Technology Assisted Review (TAR)—Da Silva Moore Revisited
ANDREW J. PECK, United States Magistrate Judge:
It has been three years since my February 24, 2012 decision in Da Silva Moore v. Publi-cis Groupe & MSL Grp., 287 F.R.D. 182 (S.D.N.Y.2012) (Peck, M.J.), affd., 2012 WL 1446534 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 26, 2012). In Da Silva Moore, I stated:
This judicial opinion now recognizes that computer-assisted review [i.e., TAR] is an acceptable way to search for relevant ESI in appropriate cases.
Da Silva Moore, 287 F.R.D. at 183. I note…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- William A. Gross Construction Associates, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Moore v. Publicis GroupeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
3Cited by7 opinions
- C.K. v. BassettDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Coventry Capital US LLC v. EEA Life Settlements, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Federal Trade Commission, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- LYNEVYCH v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Lawson v. Spirit Aerosystems, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.