Legal Opinion

Ritter v. Ritter

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2016No. 20150202PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Joshua Ritter appeals from a district court order denying his motion to modify primary residential responsibility of his two children. Joshua Ritter argues the district court erred in determining he failed to make a prima facie case that a material change in circumstances existed. We reverse and remand.

I

[¶ 2] In 2012 Joshua Ritter and Tara McDonald (formerly Tara Ritter) divorced via stipulation. The parties agreed Tara McDonald would have primary residential responsibility of their two minor children, Joshua Ritter’s parenting time would be determined by mutual…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blotske v. LeidholmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Siewert v. SiewertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hammeren v. HammerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Simburger v. SimburgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Kartes v. KartesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Slappy v. SlappyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Fleck v. FleckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Weber v. PenningtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Ritter v. RitterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API