Legal Opinion

Trantino v. NJ State Parole Bd.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 15, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

154 N.J. 19 (1998)

711 A.2d 260

THOMAS TRANTINO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT,

v.

NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD AND NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

THOMAS TRANTINO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT,

v.

NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, SUPERINTENDENT DONALD E. LEWIS AND NEW JERSEY STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 6, 1997.

Decided May 15, 1998.

Roger A. Lowenstein argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent.

Howard J. McCoach, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. In re D.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. State v. FunicelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  5. New Jersey State Parole Board v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API