Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. COMETTO

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2011No. 37157PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

Appellants challenge the district court’s refusal to allow the removal of trees within and adjacent to an access-road easement in favor of Appellants running over property belonging to their neighbors, the Comettos. Because there is substantial evidence that the trees do not unreasonably hinder maintenance or snow removal, the district court’s order is affirmed. The district court’s denial of the parties’ requests for attorney fees also is affirmed, as neither party prevailed below.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

This dispute involves several…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Blimka v. My Web Wholesaler, LLC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Abbott v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Conley v. WhittleseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Bagley v. ThomasonIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC v. Wally Enterprises, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Jerry Machado v. Charles L. RyanIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Hood V. PoormanIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Frost v. GilbertIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Millard v. TalburtIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API