Frigiking, Inc. v. Century Tire & Sales Co.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAM M. TAYLOR, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff was until February, 1976, a manufacturer and seller of automobile air conditioners and component parts for them. It sold its products to and through distributors such as Defendant, The Century Tire & Sales Company, Inc. (Century Tire, hereafter).
Plaintiff, until February, 1976, maintained its principal place of business in Dallas, Texas, which is within this District, and both Defendants, Century Tire and Samuel Rogers, are of Cincinnati, Ohio. There is also more than $10,000 in controversy so the Court finds and concludes…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Camfield Tires, Inc. v. Michelin Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- L&M Enterprises, Inc. v. Bei Sensors & Systems Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Heating & Air Specialists, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- International Therapeutics, Inc. v. McGraw-Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- L & M Enterprises, Inc. v. BEI Sensors & Systems Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.