Legal Opinion
Ricci v. Naples
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 18, 1928PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
In this court, the appellee filed a motion to erase the case from the docket for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the judgment of the City Court of Meriden, upon the equitable issues, was not a final judgment and that no final judgment could be rendered in the case until the damages had been assessed by a jury.
As far as appears from the record, no objection was made to the action of the City Court of Meriden in proceeding to the trial of the equitable issues before the question of damages claimed for trial to the jury was tried. In the trial to the court, all the issues were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Norton v. Shore Line Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- New Milford Water Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Bunnell v. Berlin Iron Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Whiting v. GaylordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Philadelphia, Reading & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Antman v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Kelly v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Klein v. DeRosaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Ratner v. WillametzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.