Legal Opinion

Bracken v. Okura

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided June 24, 2013No. Civil No. 11-00784 LEK-BMKPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT AND COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF KYO-YA AND DEFENDANT AARON OKURA’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 1983, (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT KINCHUNG CHUNG’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI, District Judge.

Before the Court are: (1) Defendant/Counterelaim Plaintiff Kyo-ya Hotels *1142and Resorts, L.P. (“Kyo-ya”), and Defendant Aaron Okura’s (“Okura”)1 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Claims Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, filed December 18, 2012 (“1983…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API